1. The Man was shoved onto the tracks by an unidentified assailant and got ran over by a New York subway train. The Photographer had his camera with him at the time and was near the man on the tracks.
2. In the little time he had, he took out his camera to try to alert the train's driver by the flash of his camera.
3. No, in my perspective, even if the man was way bigger than me, i would have put in all of my energy into trying to pull him up while shouting for help.
4. No, because as shown on the photo he took, he could have had time to try to pull the man up, and he should have known that the train's driver wouldn't have had enough time to stop the train.
5. I disagree, since it shows how a man died, while also making the photographer of that picture look bad. It is also cruel for the man's family that died to show how devastated he was in his last minute, knowing he was about to be ran over by a train.
6. Even if your a photographer, a life is worth more than a picture. Only take a photo of something bad after it has happened already,knowing that you couldn't have had done anything, but it's morally wrong to take a photo while the bad is taking action into reality while doing nothing helpful.
7. It's different for every situation, but at this one, he should have involved himself in it, knowing a life would be taken away if he had not done so.
8. Again, it depends on the situation that is happening, if its bad enough that someone could get harmed in any way, then they should stop it from happening
9. That no one was there to know what had really happened.
No comments:
Post a Comment